El Salvador’s Bitcoin Experiment: Success or Setback



El Salvador’s Bitcoin Experiment: Success or Setback

Introduction

In September 2021, El Salvador made headlines around the world by becoming the first country to adopt Bitcoin as legal tender. This bold move, spearheaded by President Nayib Bukele, positioned the small Central American nation at the forefront of global crypto adoption. The initiative promised financial inclusion, reduced remittance costs, and economic modernization. But over three years later, the world is still debating whether El Salvador’s Bitcoin experiment is a revolutionary success or an ambitious misstep.


This article delves into the goals, execution, outcomes, and future of El Salvador’s Bitcoin journey to assess whether the nation’s gamble on cryptocurrency has paid off—or fallen short.


Background: Why Bitcoin?

The Motivation Behind the Move

El Salvador's economy has long been heavily reliant on remittances, which account for about 20% of its GDP. Millions of Salvadorans living abroad send money home, but high transaction fees and delays from traditional money transfer services significantly impact the efficiency of these remittances.


President Bukele promoted Bitcoin as a solution to these inefficiencies. His government also highlighted the potential of Bitcoin to:


Attract foreign investment

Promote technological innovation

Provide banking services to the unbanked (over 70% of Salvadorans were unbanked in 2021)


Boost tourism and national branding

The Legal Framework

The Bitcoin Law, passed in June 2021, required all businesses to accept Bitcoin as payment unless they lacked the technological means. Alongside this, the government launched a national digital wallet called Chivo (meaning “cool” in Salvadoran slang), offering a $30 Bitcoin bonus to encourage adoption.


Initial Reactions and Global Attention

International Praise and Concern

The Bitcoin move was met with both enthusiasm and skepticism:


Crypto enthusiasts hailed it as a historic moment that could set a precedent for other countries.


Economists and financial institutions like the IMF and World Bank raised red flags, warning of macroeconomic risks, money laundering possibilities, and volatility concerns.


Public Opinion

Initial local reactions were mixed. While some welcomed the innovation and free $30 in Bitcoin, many were wary of its volatility and expressed confusion about how to use it. Protests erupted, with demonstrators opposing the mandatory acceptance clause and the lack of public consultation.


Implementation Challenges

Technical Issues with the Chivo Wallet

Despite the ambitious rollout, the Chivo wallet suffered from significant technical glitches, including:


System crashes

Identity theft and fraud

Delays in transactions

Poor customer service


Many Salvadorans reported losing access to their funds or encountering errors that led them to abandon the wallet altogether.


Low Usage Rates

Despite government incentives, Bitcoin usage remained low. A 2022 study by the National Bureau of Economic Research found that:

Only 20% of those who downloaded Chivo continued using it after spending the initial bonus.

Fewer than 5% of all transactions in El Salvador were conducted in Bitcoin.

Most businesses preferred cash or credit cards due to Bitcoin's price fluctuations.


Economic Impacts: A Closer Look

Bitcoin Price Volatility

One of the most controversial aspects of the experiment was the government’s decision to buy Bitcoin with public funds. President Bukele tweeted about every major purchase, eventually amassing over 2,000 Bitcoins.


However, the crypto market crash of 2022 significantly reduced the value of these holdings. By late 2022, the portfolio had lost over 50% of its value, prompting criticism from economists and opposition leaders.


Tourism and Tech Investments

On a more positive note, El Salvador saw a boost in tourism, with a 30% increase in 2022, partially attributed to global crypto curiosity. The government also launched initiatives like Bitcoin City, a planned smart city powered by geothermal energy and funded through Bitcoin Bonds—although progress has been slow.


Some international crypto companies opened offices in El Salvador, and digital nomads flocked to the country, taking advantage of Bitcoin-friendly policies and residency offers.


IMF Tensions and Credit Ratings

The Bitcoin policy strained El Salvador’s relationship with the International Monetary Fund, which withheld loan negotiations over the country's crypto stance. Credit rating agencies like Moody’s downgraded El Salvador’s bonds, citing increased financial risk and lack of transparency.


Financial Inclusion: Success or Myth?

Unbanked Population Still Unreached

One of the primary goals of the Bitcoin Law was to bank the unbanked. However, studies suggest that Bitcoin did not significantly increase financial inclusion. People in rural areas continued to rely on cash, often citing lack of access to smartphones or internet.


Additionally, Chivo’s adoption did not translate into broader financial literacy. Many users reported they didn’t understand Bitcoin or how its value fluctuated, undermining trust in the system.


Security and Transparency Concerns

Surveillance and Control

Although Bitcoin is often associated with decentralization and freedom, critics argue that the Chivo wallet operates more like a centralized platform. The lack of transparency regarding wallet architecture and transaction data has sparked concerns about government surveillance.


Corruption and Mismanagement Allegations

Civil society groups have also accused the Bukele administration of opaque financial practices related to Bitcoin purchases. The government has refused to disclose wallet addresses or transaction records, making it difficult to audit or verify holdings.


Bitcoin Bonds and the Future of Bitcoin City

The Bitcoin Bond Initiative

El Salvador announced plans to issue $1 billion in Bitcoin-backed "Volcano Bonds", with half the funds intended for Bitcoin purchases and the rest for infrastructure. However, the launch has been delayed multiple times due to market conditions and legal uncertainties.


Bitcoin City: A Dream Deferred?

Bitcoin City, pitched as a tax-free, high-tech utopia powered by geothermal energy, remains mostly conceptual. While the idea captured global imagination, tangible progress has been minimal, and many view it as a symbolic rather than substantive initiative.


International Implications: A Global Case Study

Lessons for Other Nations

El Salvador’s experience serves as a valuable case study for other countries considering crypto adoption. It highlights the potential benefits of innovation and branding, but also the pitfalls of poor implementation, lack of transparency, and economic volatility.


Countries like the Central African Republic have since experimented with Bitcoin-like initiatives, but most nations remain cautious, citing El Salvador’s mixed outcomes as a reason to delay similar actions.


Conclusion: A Success, a Setback, or a Work in Progress?

El Salvador’s Bitcoin experiment is neither a clear success nor an outright failure. It represents a bold, unprecedented initiative that has drawn both praise and criticism. While the country has gained global attention, seen increased tourism, and opened the door to tech experimentation, it has also faced technical challenges, financial losses, and limited adoption.


As of 2025, the jury is still out. Much depends on Bitcoin’s long-term market behavior, the government’s continued commitment to transparency and infrastructure, and the evolution of global crypto regulation. El Salvador’s journey is far from over—and the world is watching.

Comments